Skip to Content

Stihl MS 180 vs. 170: The Ultimate Comparison

Stihl MS 180 vs. 170: The Ultimate Comparison

Stihl is undoubtedly one of the market’s leading manufacturers when it comes to chainsaws. This is great news for any woodworker as you’re guaranteed a reliable product if you stick with the company.

The only issue is, you’ll need to decide which model is right for you. With so many good options, this choice can get quite challenging.

When you start your search for a high-quality, dependable, chances are you’ll come across the Stihl MS 180 and the Stihl MS 170.

So which one should you go with? Today’s guide on Stihl MS 180 vs 170 will help you answer this question depending on your woodworking needs and budget.

Stihl MS 180 vs 170: Overview

The MS 170 seems to be more of a beginner’s model compared to the MS 180. Measuring 12 x 16 inches, the MS 170 is ideal for clearing branches and cutting firewood.

The MS 180, on the other hand, measures 11 x 13 inches and is great for woodworkers looking to score more features to accommodate more demanding jobs.

Going into this comparison, you should note that both chainsaws are well-built and perform effectively, they’re just intended to meet a different set of working needs.

Stihl MS 180 vs 170: Comparison

Now, let’s take a look at how the two models compare in each of the following aspects:

Engine Power

First, we’ll begin with the engine power on both chainsaws. The Stihl MS 170 offers a power output of 1.3 kW (30cc), whereas the Stihl MS 180 delivers a power output of 1.5 kW of power (31cc).

As you can tell, the two models are pretty close but the MS 180 is a bit more powerful. However, you probably won’t be able to notice this difference during most applications.

Weight

When it comes to weight, you want to make sure the chainsaw you end up with isn’t too heavy that it’s too difficult to use, nor too lightweight that it’s flimsy and unstable. Luckily, you won’t have to worry about either problem with today’s models.

Both the MS 170 and the MS 180 are moderately light, weighing in at 8.6 pounds and 9 pounds respectively. This means that you should have no trouble carrying around or using either of these chainsaws.

Features

MS 170

It can be very tricky to find a chainsaw that’s both sturdy and compact, but the MS 170 did just that and topped things off with an excellent performance that’s as accurate as it’s robust while being small.

The blade on this model is quite versatile. It’s suitable for completing a wide range of average household purposes, which is only further supported by its compact size so almost anyone can use it whether to clear branches or cut firewood.

The MS170 can easily handle 6 x 6 inches lumber in under a second. This means it saves you precious time to let you tend to other chores quickly.

This chainsaw is equipped with a two-stroke motor, providing a massive power-to-weight ratio in such a small package. The fitted carburetor serves to maintain the balance of the air-to-fuel ratio.

There’s also an air filter that you can adjust to free the chainsaw from dust and debris for maximum user convenience.

MS 180

When comparing the features of the Stihl MS 180 vs 170, it’s safe to say that the MS 180 takes the cake thanks to the many features it offers.

For starters, there’s the Ematic chain lubrication mechanism that helps reduce the chainsaw’s bar oil consumption by 50%.

The MS 180 also comes with a single-lever control unit to make using the chainsaw a fool-proof process. You can use the same bar to start, throttle, and stop the machine.

The MS 180 is equipped with a side chain tensioner as well. This ensures the user’s safety while operating the chainsaw by saving them from having to touch the blade while taking it off.

Another impressive feature of this model is the anti-vibration system. Not only does this feature make using the saw easier by producing minimal vibrations, but it also prevents the long-term adverse effects of vibrations on blood vessels.

Additionally, the MS 180 includes a no-fuel layer between the burned charge and the free charge in the combustion chamber and the crank chamber respectively. It’s even powered by a 2-MIX motor to supply it with tremendous force.

Capacity

While not many people pay attention to the fuel capacity and chain oil capacity on a chainsaw, it’s important to note them in today’s comparison so you can make a well-informed choice.

In the MS 170, the fuel capacity is 8.5 ounces. This is also the fuel capacity in the MS 180, which is more than enough to meet the demands of any woodworker.

As for the chain oil capacity, this is where you can spot a difference. The MS 170 can hold only 4.9 ounces of oil at a time, while the MS 180 can hold 5.1 ounces of chain oil at a time.

Affordability

Finally, you need to consider your budget since both models are priced differently. Granted they fall within the same range, but the MS 180 is a bit more expensive.

If you don’t mind paying the extra bit of cash, then the choice should come down to what model fulfills your woodworking needs better.

Stihl MS 180 vs 170: Pros and Cons

MS 180 Pros:

  • User-friendly controls
  • Accurate and powerful
  • Lightweight
  • Lowers fuel cost
  • The anti-vibration system boosts stability and reduces associated health risks
  • Less bar oil consumption

MS 180 Cons:

  • More expensive

MS 170 Pros:

  • Lightweight
  • Fast and powerful performance
  • Accurate and smooth cuts
  • Easy to use
  • Suitable for beginners
  • Ideal for household use

MS 170 Cons:

  • Not as durable
  • The handle isn’t very sturdy

Stihl MS 180 vs 170: Which one Should You Get?

There you have it, a complete comparison of the Stihl MS 180 vs 170 to help you make up your mind.

So, which one should you choose? Well, it depends on the type of applications you’re looking to perform.

If you need a chainsaw to help with average household projects such as clearing branches and cutting firewood, then the MS 170 is a great fit.

If you’re after a machine with lots of features to accommodate complex and more demanding jobs, then the MS 180 is a better option.